I don’t remember how the conversation started, but The Scientist said something that prompted my head to snap up and say, “I didn’t know you were kinky.” Because our sex had been far from kinky at this point, and I was planning on asking him to be rougher with me the next time we were together. Don’t get me wrong, the sex was great. But we all know that I like it rough.
He said, “Yeah, but I didn’t think that was really your thing.”
BWAHAHAHAHA.
I laughed and said, “Are you kidding? I’m, like, really really really reallyreallyreally submissive. In fact, my OkCupid profile lists ‘rough sex’ as one of the things I can’t live without.”
“Wow. I horribly misinterpreted a comment that you made on our first date, then.”
Apparently!
REALLY, Amanda Bynes?!
I’ve spoken before about how Amanda Bynes’ tweets make me kind of sad and they seem to be those of someone that just wants desperately to find The One and won’t be happy until she does. It seems that she’s only happy when she’s in love.
This one really stuck out to me:
Like, really? Immediately? What’s the rush? I mean, if you want to get married, great, but what’s so bad about being with someone, being in love with them, and taking your time with the getting married part? I don’t see why that piece of paper needs to be the focus. You don’t need a piece of paper to make your relationship meaningful and legitimate.
Well, then came this one:
Eesh. She’s 24, you guys. TWENTY-FOUR. Is being unmarried at 24 really that terrible? It’s not the 1950′s anymore. People don’t expect 24-year-olds to be married.
I guess these tweets just make me sad. It’s sad that she seems to put that much pressure on trying to get married. Marriage is great, if that’s what you want, but I feel like being so desperate for it is a really unhealthy thing. It shouldn’t be the end all and be all of how you define whether or not you’re successful in life.