JUST BECAUSE I WRITE ABOUT SEX DOES NOT MEAN I WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH YOU. IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT I WANT TO TELL YOU INSANELY PRIVATE DETAILS ABOUT MY SEX LIFE. IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU CAN SEXUALLY HARASS ME ON THE INTERNET. AND IT DEFINITELY DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU CAN SEND ME UNSOLICITED NAKED PICTURES OF YOURSELF.
If I did not ask to see your penis, why on earth would you assume I wanted to see it? If I have never talked to you, why would you assume that your opening email to me should be a picture of you naked including the words “I don’t want to make assumptions about you, but…?” Assuming that some woman wants to see your penis in a picture attached to an email when she has not indicated that she does is no different than a man on the train assuming that he can expose himself to a woman. Would you expose yourself to a woman on the train? No? Then why would you expose yourself to her in an email?
It is unsolicited exposure. It is exhibitionism. It is a sex crime. It is sexual harassment. Unless I have explicitly asked for a picture of you naked, DO NOT SEND IT TO ME. Get it? Got it? GOOD.
I thought we’d been over this once, twice, three times, four times, but apparently there needed to be a fifth time.
I'm Britni, a snarky bitch and generally awesome person. I write about sex, love, and bullshit. If sex-positivity, discussions about BDSM and kink, queer issues, and topics that are completely inappropriate by society's standards make you uncomfortable, then this blog is not for you.
Good Vibes 
4 Comments
B-b-but if he sends his cock, you will send your tits. RIGHT? RIGHT?
Vom.
You mean that liking sex and writing about it does not mean you want random cock shots? Rilly?
I have a friend who has told me about guys sending pictures of their cocks to her. This is the only reason I’m not shocked to see it here…. I have a pic of an actual rooster I sent to her, she sent a kitty cat back
the nerve of some people