<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Act of Just Being in a Bar Means You Automatically Consent to Everything!</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m nothing but a brash and impetuous girl striving to be true to myself while searching for somewhere to belong, someone to love, and a better version of me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 02:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Nell Gwynne</title>
		<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14284</link>
		<dc:creator>Nell Gwynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britisshameless.com/?p=3479#comment-14284</guid>
		<description>God Bless Missouri, eh? I&#039;m glad I got out of there.

I do not honestly understand why GGW continues to get away with this sort of behavior. If student filmmakers at my college have to fill out all sorts of paperwork, and get actor&#039;s signatures on media releases, then why do these douchecaneoes get away with filming an assault? Bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God Bless Missouri, eh? I&#8217;m glad I got out of there.</p>
<p>I do not honestly understand why GGW continues to get away with this sort of behavior. If student filmmakers at my college have to fill out all sorts of paperwork, and get actor&#8217;s signatures on media releases, then why do these douchecaneoes get away with filming an assault? Bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Act of Just Being in a Bar Means You Automatically Consent to Everything! -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Act of Just Being in a Bar Means You Automatically Consent to Everything! -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britisshameless.com/?p=3479#comment-14283</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Britni TheVadgeWig, Hedone. Hedone said: RT @britisshameless The Act of Just Being in a Bar Means You Automatically Consent to Everything! http://bit.ly/aJOE6P [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Britni TheVadgeWig, Hedone. Hedone said: RT @britisshameless The Act of Just Being in a Bar Means You Automatically Consent to Everything! <a href="http://bit.ly/aJOE6P" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aJOE6P</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14281</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britisshameless.com/?p=3479#comment-14281</guid>
		<description>WTF!  How far up their own arsehole are these guys?  This jury should be arraigned for assault themselves; at the very least for being an accessory after the fact.  I&#039;m speechless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF!  How far up their own arsehole are these guys?  This jury should be arraigned for assault themselves; at the very least for being an accessory after the fact.  I&#8217;m speechless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: french</title>
		<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14280</link>
		<dc:creator>french</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 06:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britisshameless.com/?p=3479#comment-14280</guid>
		<description>WHAT.  THE FUCK.

That is absolutely reprehensible, abominable, and fucking infuriating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT.  THE FUCK.</p>
<p>That is absolutely reprehensible, abominable, and fucking infuriating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14278</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britisshameless.com/?p=3479#comment-14278</guid>
		<description>Ridiculous. I hate how a jury can just choose to &quot;change&quot; the definition of the word consent in order to say that the law was not being broken, when in fact by the letter of the law and the actual definition of consent the law was clearly and blatantly being broken. The jury&#039;s job should be deciding whether it happened, not whether they think it should be legal. Not only am I upset that the CAN do that, I&#039;m upset that they DID do that, as I am anytime a jury reaches a victim-blaming verdict. What the hell? What decent person would come up with a verdict like that? Yanking someone&#039;s shirt down against their will doesn&#039;t suddenly stop being assault (and illegal) when you cross the threshold of a bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous. I hate how a jury can just choose to &#8220;change&#8221; the definition of the word consent in order to say that the law was not being broken, when in fact by the letter of the law and the actual definition of consent the law was clearly and blatantly being broken. The jury&#8217;s job should be deciding whether it happened, not whether they think it should be legal. Not only am I upset that the CAN do that, I&#8217;m upset that they DID do that, as I am anytime a jury reaches a victim-blaming verdict. What the hell? What decent person would come up with a verdict like that? Yanking someone&#8217;s shirt down against their will doesn&#8217;t suddenly stop being assault (and illegal) when you cross the threshold of a bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia West</title>
		<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14276</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britisshameless.com/?p=3479#comment-14276</guid>
		<description>Wow. This infuriates me. What the fuck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This infuriates me. What the fuck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalanu</title>
		<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14273</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britisshameless.com/?p=3479#comment-14273</guid>
		<description>Holy crap. That&#039;s insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap. That&#8217;s insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elodie</title>
		<link>http://britisshameless.com/2010/07/the-act-of-just-being-in-a-bar-means-you-automatically-consent-to-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-14272</link>
		<dc:creator>Elodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britisshameless.com/?p=3479#comment-14272</guid>
		<description>&quot;Does the word “no” mean nothing?&quot;

I&#039;d say that&#039;s exactly it. 

And it&#039;s beyond claiming the woman &quot;really wants&quot; something to which she did not consent. To have this mindset, you have to think that women have no sexual agency at all. That we are all just objects, to be used however men please. That sexual assault against a woman is &lt;i&gt;literally impossible&lt;/i&gt;, just as it would be impossible to sexually assault a blow-up doll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does the word “no” mean nothing?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s exactly it. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s beyond claiming the woman &#8220;really wants&#8221; something to which she did not consent. To have this mindset, you have to think that women have no sexual agency at all. That we are all just objects, to be used however men please. That sexual assault against a woman is <i>literally impossible</i>, just as it would be impossible to sexually assault a blow-up doll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
